This is historical material, "frozen in time." The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.
NARA is disabling support for IPv4 and will support only IPv6 protocols for accessing this website after September 24, 2021. If you receive a network error or have other issues when attempting to access this site, please contact your Internet Service Provider for assistance.
State by State Analysis
of the Patients' Bill of Rights
2,050,000 Americans in Alabama cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Alabama has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements and direct access for women's health
services. However, the state does not provide for the full range of patients'
rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above,
these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA
plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,040,000 women in Alabama are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
210,000 Americans in Alaska cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
States have enacted a number of patient protections. At least
30 states have enacted provisions to give patients access to needed specialists
-- including giving women greater access to qualified health specialists
for women's services. At least 28 states have enacted legislation to help
ensure that patients have access to emergency room services when and where
the need arises. However, states do not provide for the full range of patients'
rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above,
these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA
plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
100,000 women in Alaska are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,720,000 Americans in Arizona cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Arizona has enacted a number of patient protections, including
anti-gag clauses, disclosure of physician incentive arrangements, and access
to external appeals. However, the state does not provide for the full range
of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined
above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in
ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
830,000 women in Arizona are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,000,000 Americans in Arkansas cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Arkansas has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
and continuity of care protections. However, the state does not provide
for the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
500,000 women in Arkansas are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
13,090,000 Americans in California cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
California has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
access to emergency room services, and prohibiting "gag clauses." However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
6,230,000 women in California are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,810,000 Americans in Colorado cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Colorado has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
continuity of care provisions, and access to emergency room services. However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
890,000 women in Colorado are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,740,000 Americans in Connecticut cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Connecticut has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
and access to emergency room services. However, the state does not provide
for the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
910,000 women in Connecticut are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
370,000 Americans in Delaware cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Delaware has enacted a number of patient protections, including
direct access for women's health services and prohibiting "gag clauses."
However, the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights
recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
190,000 women in Delaware are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
160,000 Americans in the District of Columbia cannot be assured all
of the patient protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission
on Consumer Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these
protections into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted
protections. Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten
by employers) are not covered under state law and are not required to abide
by state-enacted protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important
patient protections for health plans directly regulated by states.
States have enacted a number of patient protections. At least
30 states have enacted provisions to give patients access to needed specialists
-- including giving women greater access to qualified health specialists
for women's services. At least 28 states have enacted legislation to help
ensure that patients have access to emergency room services when and where
the need arises. However, states do not provide for the full range of patients'
rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above,
these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA
plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
80,000 women in the District of Columbia are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
5,470,000 Americans in Florida cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Florida has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
continuity of care provisions, and access to emergency room services. However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
2,710,000 women in Florida are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
3,440,000 Americans in Georgia cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Georgia has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
prohibiting "gag clauses, and disclosure of physician incentive arrangements.
However, the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights
recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,700,000 women in Georgia are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
500,000 Americans in Hawaii cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Hawaii has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements. However, the state does not provide
for the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
250,000 women in Hawaii are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
500,000 Americans in Idaho cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not covered
under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted protections.
Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections for health
plans directly regulated by states.
Idaho has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
access to emergency room services, prohibiting "gag clauses" and confidentiality
of health information. However, the state does not provide for the full
range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
240,000 women in Idaho are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
6,220,000 Americans in Illinois cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Illinois has enacted a number of patient protections, including
direct access for women's health services. However, the state does not
provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality
Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do
not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
3,120,000 women in Illinois are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
3,330,000 Americans in Indiana cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Indiana has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
and prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for
the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,600,000 women in Indiana are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,420,000 Americans in Iowa cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
States have enacted a number of patient protections. At least
30 states have enacted provisions to give patients access to needed specialists
-- including giving women greater access to qualified health specialists
for women's services. At least 28 states have enacted legislation to help
ensure that patients have access to emergency room services when and where
the need arises. However, states do not provide for the full range of patients'
rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above,
these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA
plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
700,000 women in Iowa are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,250,000 Americans in Kansas cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Kansas has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, continuity of care protections, access
to emergency room services, and prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the
state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
600,000 women in Kansas are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,730,000 Americans in Kentucky cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
States have enacted a number of patient protections. At least
30 states have enacted provisions to give patients access to needed specialists
-- including giving women greater access to qualified health specialists
for women's services. At least 28 states have enacted legislation to help
ensure that patients have access to emergency room services when and where
the need arises. However, states do not provide for the full range of patients'
rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above,
these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA
plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
860,000 women in Kentucky are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,700,000 Americans in Louisiana cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Louisiana has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health care
services, access to emergency room services, disclosure of physician incentive
arrangements, and prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the state does not
provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality
Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do
not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
830,000 women in Louisiana are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
630,000 Americans in Maine cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Maine has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, access to specialists, continuity
of care protections, access to emergency room services, prohibiting "gag
clauses," confidentiality of health information, and disclosure of physician
incentive arrangements. However, the state does not provide for the full
range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
310,000 women in Maine are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
2,230,000 Americans in Maryland cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Maryland has enacted a number of patient protections, including
continuity of care protections, access to emergency room services, prohibiting
"gag clauses,"confidentiality of health information, and disclosure of
physician incentive arrangements. However, the state does not provide for
the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,130,000 women in Maryland are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
3,300,000 Americans in Massachusetts cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Massachusetts has enacted a number of patient protections, including
prohibiting "gag clauses" and confidentiality of health information. However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,600,000 women in Massachusetts are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
5,320,000 Americans in Michigan cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Michigan has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, access to emergency room services
and prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for
the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
2,560,000 women in Michigan are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
2,390,000 Americans in Minnesota cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Minnesota has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health specialists,
continuity of care protections, and prohibiting "gag clauses." However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,120,000 women in Minnesota are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
2,360,000 Americans in Missouri cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Missouri has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, access to specialists, access to emergency
room services, disclosure of physician incentive arrangements and prohibiting
"gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for the full range of
patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined
above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in
ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,160,000 women in Missouri are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,130,000 Americans in Mississippi cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
States have enacted a number of patient protections. At least
30 states have enacted provisions to give patients access to needed specialists
-- including giving women greater access to qualified health specialists
for women's services. At least 28 states have enacted legislation to help
ensure that patients have access to emergency room services when and where
the need arises. However, states do not provide for the full range of patients'
rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above,
these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA
plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
570,000 women in Mississippi are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
340,000 Americans in Montana cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Montana has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, access to specialists, continuity
of care protections, access to emergency room services, and prohibiting
"gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for the full range of
patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined
above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in
ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
170,000 women in Montana are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
740,000 Americans in Nebraska cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Nebraska has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, access to emergency room services,
and prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for
the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
340,000 women in Nebraska are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
860,000 Americans in Nevada cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Nevada has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses", and access
to emergency room services. However, the state does not provide for the
full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
400,000 women in Nevada are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
610,000 Americans in New Hampshire cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
New Hampshire has enacted a number of patient protections, including
prohibiting "gag clauses", access to emergency room services, and confidentiality
of health information. However, the state does not provide for the full
range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
290,000 women in New Hampshire are in ERISA
health plans and Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get
the range of protections recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
3,820,000 Americans in New Jersey cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
New Jersey has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses", access
to emergency room services, anti-discrimination provisions, and disclosure
of physician incentive arrangements. However, the state does not provide
for the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,920,000 women in New Jersey are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
540,000 Americans in New Mexico cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
New Mexico has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
prohibiting "gag clauses", and confidentiality of health information. However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
260,000 women in New Mexico are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
7,570,000 Americans in New York cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
New York has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, direct access for women's health services,
prohibiting "gag clauses", access to emergency room services, and disclosure
of physician incentive arrangements. However, the state does not provide
for the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
3,800,000 women in New York are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
3,470,000 Americans in North Carolina cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
North Carolina has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses", access
to emergency room services, anti-discrimination provisions, and external
appeals entities. However, the state does not provide for the full range
of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined
above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in
ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,730,000 women in North Carolina are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
280,000 Americans in North Dakota cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
North Dakota has enacted a number of patient protections, including
prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for the
full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
130,000 women in North Dakota are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
5,960,000 Americans in Ohio cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Ohio has enacted a number of patient protections, including information
disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses", access to emergency
room services, disclosure of physician incentive arrangements, and external
appeals entities. However, the state does not provide for the full range
of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined
above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in
ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
2,940,000 women in Ohio are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,240,000 Americans in Oklahoma cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Oklahoma has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses", and access
to emergency room services. However, the state does not provide for the
full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
630,000 women in Oklahoma are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,520,000 Americans in Oregon cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Oregon has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses", access
to emergency room services, and direct access for women's health services.
However, the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights
recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
750,000 women in Oregon are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
6,160,000 Americans in Pennsylvania cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Pennsylvania has enacted a number of patient protections, including
prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for the
full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
3,120,000 women in Pennsylvania are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
460,000 Americans in Rhode Island cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Rhode Island has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses"and disclosure
of physician incentive arrangements, and external appeals entities. However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
230,000 women in Rhode Island are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
1,690,000 Americans in South Carolina cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
States have enacted a number of patient protections. At least
30 states have enacted provisions to give patients access to needed specialists
-- including giving women greater access to qualified health specialists
for women's services. At least 28 states have enacted legislation to help
ensure that patients have access to emergency room services when and where
the need arises. However, states do not provide for the full range of patients'
rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above,
these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA
plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
840,000 women in South Carolina are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
300,000 Americans in South Dakota cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
States have enacted a number of patient protections. At least
30 states have enacted provisions to give patients access to needed specialists
-- including giving women greater access to qualified health specialists
for women's services. At least 28 states have enacted legislation to help
ensure that patients have access to emergency room services when and where
the need arises. However, states do not provide for the full range of patients'
rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above,
these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA
plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
150,000 women in South Dakota are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
2,300,000 Americans in Tennessee cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Tennessee has enacted a number of patient protections, including
prohibiting "gag clauses", and access to emergency room services. However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,180,000 women in Tennessee are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
8,060,000 Americans in Texas cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Texas has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses", access
to emergency room services, and external appeals entities. However, the
state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
3,900,000 women in Texas are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
950,000 Americans in Utah cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not covered
under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted protections.
Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections for health
plans directly regulated by states.
Utah has enacted a number of patient protections, including prohibiting
"gag clauses" and direct access for women's health services. However, the
state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
470,000 women in Utah are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
290,000 Americans in Vermont cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Vermont has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses," disclosure
of physician incentive arrangements, and external appeals entities. However,
the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights recommended
by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
140,000 women in Vermont are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
3,060,000 Americans in Virginia cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Virginia has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses," and disclosure
of physician incentive arrangements. However, the state does not provide
for the full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission.
Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply
to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,540,000 women in Virginia are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
2,550,000 Americans in Washington cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Washington has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses," access
to emergency room services, and disclosure of physician incentive arrangements.
However, the state does not provide for the full range of patients' rights
recommended by the Quality Commission. Also, as outlined above, these state-enacted
protections do not fully apply to patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,240,000 women in Washington are in ERISA health plans and
Federal legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections
recommended by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
670,000 Americans in West Virginia cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self-insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
West Virginia has enacted a number of patient protections, including
information disclosure requirements, prohibiting "gag clauses," and access
to emergency room services. However, the state does not provide for the
full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
350,000 women in West Virginia are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
2,900,000 Americans in Wisconsin cannot be assured all of the patient
protections recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer
Protection and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections
into law. This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections.
Because of ERISA, self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers)
are not covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Wisconsin has enacted a number of patient protections, including
prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for the
full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
1,440,000 women in Wisconsin are in ERISA health plans and Federal
legislation is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended
by the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.
WHY PASSING A FEDERAL PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS IS IMPORTANT
190,000 Americans in Wyoming cannot be assured all of the patient protections
recommended by the President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality, even if their state enacts all of these protections into law.
This is because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
is frequently used to preempt state-enacted protections. Because of ERISA,
self- insured plans (plans directly underwritten by employers) are not
covered under state law and are not required to abide by state-enacted
protections. Moreover, ERISA can even preempt important patient protections
for health plans directly regulated by states.
Wyoming has enacted a number of patient protections, including
prohibiting "gag clauses." However, the state does not provide for the
full range of patients' rights recommended by the Quality Commission. Also,
as outlined above, these state-enacted protections do not fully apply to
patients in ERISA plans.
Passing a patients' bill of rights is particularly important for
women.
100,000 women in Wyoming are in ERISA health plans and Federal legislation
is necessary to assure they get the range of protections recommended by
the Quality Commission.
Over 60 percent of physician visits are made by women, and women make
three quarters of the health care decisions in American households.
Therefore, patient protections that help consumers make informed decisions
are particularly important for women.
Women in managed care plans are increasingly dissatisfied with the quality
of care. Nearly 70 percent of privately insured women ages 18 to 65
are in managed care plans. Almost two-fifths of women in managed care plans
worry that they will not be able to get speciality care when they need
it. Twenty-seven percent of women in managed care plans worry that they
will be denied a medical procedure they need.
Without the patients' bill of rights, women may not receive important
preventive services. The patient protection that gives women direct
access to an obstetrician/gynecologist is not only necessary to make sure
that pregnant women get the care they need, but is also important to assure
women get important preventive services. Studies show that gynecologists
are almost two times as likely to perform timely, needed women's preventive
services.
Congress must pass a Federally-enforceable patients' bill of rights
to assure high quality care for all patients. The President has called
on Congress to enact the Quality Commission's recommendations including:
assuring patients access to easily understood information; access to the
specialists, including specialists for women's health needs; continuity
of care for those undergoing a course of treatment for a chronic or disabling
condition; access to emergency services when and where the need arises;
disclosure of financial incentives that could influence medical decisions;
prohibition of "gag clauses"; anti-discrimination protections; and an internal
and external appeals process to address grievances with health decisions.